Board Ch. *328 The Jobling case is relatively unimportant so far … 662 195 ... Cargill v. Gotts [1981] 1 All ER 682 179 Chasemore v. Richards (1859) HL Cas 349 176 Childers v. Anker [1995] EGCS 116 35 Collins v. Thames Water Utilities Ltd [1994] 49 EG 116 155 Cook v. Ross Poultry Ltd [1982] RA 187 259 Similarly, in the case of Chasemore v/s Richards 1859, Plaintiff was running a mill on his own land, and for this purpose, he was using the water of the stream for a long time. The easement of lateral support for one's land furnishes another illustration. 365, by WIGHTMAN, J., the holding was but the dictum of an emi-nent judge, followed by no decision upon the point, and in view of the later decisions, Balston v. Bensted might have Entries Sitemap 7 References: [1859] 7 HLC 349, [1859] EngR 894, (1859) 7 HLC 349, (1859) 11 ER 140 Links: Commonlii Coram: Lord Wensleydale Ratio: The House was asked whether an owner of land had a right to sink a well upon his own premises, and thereby abstract the subterranean water percolating through his own soil, which would otherwise, by the natural force of gravity, have found its way into springs which fed the River Wandle, the flow of which the plaintiff in that action had enjoyed for upwards of sixty years. In Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. L. Cas. That is the case of Webb v. Bird, which states the law as explicitly as it possibly can be stated. 285, 297. Co. v. Pion [30]. owner has the right to do whatever he IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. Is something important missing? 1 That case was afterwards affirmed, and is a leading case on the subject of underground water, Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. L. C. 349. In all that has been said in subsequent discussions little, if anything, has been added to the arguments of counsel and of the court in that case. Cas., 364; Frazier v. the riparian owner on a navigable river, in addition to the right connected with navigation to which he is entitled as one of the public, retains his rights, as an ordinary riparian owner, underlying and controlled by, but not extinguished by, the public right of navigation.’ Jurisdiction: England and Wales This case cites: Last Update: 24 November 2019 Ref: 276469 br>. Chasemore v. Richards In this case, the plaintiff’s place was located at a lower elevation and the respondent was at a higher elevation. Many legal terms are subject to interpretation. The issue is whether lack of conspicuousness allows for the loss of property use as desired by an individual in an easement Does it matter that the noise was there for an extended period but did not cause a nuisance until recently? You might be interested in the historical meaning of this term. Syllabus ¶0 1. Entries Sitemap 1 Updates continuously as new terms and definitions are published. Divorce--Allowance of Attorney's Fee to Wife Granted Decree. This case considered the right to intercept and harvest groundwater percolating through the soil. Cas. And Wheatleyy. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of the State ... by New York (State ). RICHARD v. RICHARD. The case, however, never went any further, and a juror was withdrawn. The World's Largest Free and Online Legal Dictionary. The Legal Dictionary offers you access to an English definition and synonym dictionary for thousands of other words. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk, Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Tigana: CA 19 Jul 2005. lw301 topic features of freehold estate. This Law Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions for terms that can be found on the Encyclopedia of Law websites. You might be interested in the historical meaning of this term. Table of Cases A-Gen v. Chambers (1854) 23 LJ Ch. If you search for an entry, then decide you want to see what another legal encyclopedia says about it, you may find your entry in this section. Through percolation, the water gathered in the well of deft. As pointed out in Chasemore v. Richards (I859), 7 H. ofL. 982 ; 2 Id. Definitions supported by published research from over 130 jurisdictions. Publication date 1872 Publisher A. Bleecker Banks Collection americana Digitizing sponsor Google Book from the collections of Harvard University Language English Volume 45. i)Ryland V.Fletcher ii) Shiffman's case iii) Peters V. Prince of Wales Theatre,iv) Carstirs V. Taylor v) Richards V. Lothian vi) Green V. Chelsea Water Works Company vii) Crow hurst V. A.B. Putting aside the statutes, the defendant's rights cannot be seriously contested. Bass v Gregory (1890) is an English tort law and English land law case, concerning a ventilation shaft on under or through adjoining land (a "passage of air"). Court of Appeals. Free Online Dictionary of Law Terms and Legal Definitions, Latin American and Spanish Encyclopedia of Law, Historical Law in the Encyclopedia of Law, Historical Definitions in the Encyclopedia of Law, Legal Encyclopedia of Historical Books and Documents, Legal Encyclopedia of Books and Documents of the 20th Century, the Legal Abbreviations and Acronyms Dictionary. Entries Sitemap 5 2. He has the right to have it come to him in its natural state, in flow, quantity, and quality, and to go from him without obstruction; . Chasemore v. Richards, [27]. Entries Sitemap 3 Main Sitemap Index In short, "downstream" recipients of the water have no right to receive flows of percolating … RICHARD v. RICHARD 1930 OK 181 286 P. 900 142 Okla. 302 Case Number: 19400 Decided: 04/15/1930 Supreme Court of Oklahoma. The Legal Dictionary is a comprehensive source of meanings and synonims for more than 5.000 most common legal terms. This Law Encyclopedia will be updated as new terminology emerges in the field, as new legislation is enacted, and as legal terms take on new meaning. The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of stream. This site uses cookies to improve your experience. The case, however, never went any further, and a juror was withdrawn. 316. … This case cites: Appeal from – Chasemore v Richards, Clerk To The Croydon Local Board Of Health Cexc (EngR 524, Commonlii, (1857) 2 H and N 168, (1857) 157 ER 71) The law Lords were unanimous that they were bound by their own previous decisions. St. 528, is very similar. Page: 862↓ words are, “the power of sinking and driving within the said whole grounds for the conveniency of his or their other works, in so far as the same can be done without incommoding or interrupting.” In a quite recent case4 it was 'Greenleaf v. Francis (1836), 18 Pick. twenty years' exclusive enjoyment. Cf. Your email address will not be published. ed.) Held: Lord Wensleydale said that: ‘it has been now settled that the rights to the enjoyment of a natural stream of water on the surface, ex jure naturae, belongs to the proprietor of the adjoining lands, as a natural incident to the right to the soil itself, and that he is entitled to the benefit of it, as he is to all the other natural advantages belonging to the land of which he is the owner. Plaintiff sued Congress, hoping to compel release. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. The defendant by constructing a well on his own land blocked … 5 Scienter action i) Hudson V. Roberts ii) Jackson Smithson Ch.6-1 Vicarious Liability: It defines common acronyms and includes links to information on major legislation and related legal terms. 4 Gale on Easements, 20th Ed, para 6-27; Chasemore v Richards (1859) 7 HLC 376; Stephens v Anglia Water Authority [1987] 1 WLR 1381 (CA) where the Court of Appeal stated: “As the law stands, the right of the landowner to extract subterranean water flowing in undefined channels beneath his land established by Chasemore v Richards and Bradford A contrary dictum is stated in Keeble v. Hickeringill (1706) 11 Mod. 168. See also Roath v. Driscoll, (185o), 20 Conn. 533 Browse or run a search for Chasemore V. Richards in the American Encyclopedia of Law, the Asian Encyclopedia of Law, the European Encyclopedia of Law, the UK Encyclopedia of Law or the Latin American and Spanish Encyclopedia of Law.. Chasemore V. Richards in Historical Law . Christie v. Davey (1893) 1 Ch. United States v. Richardson Case Brief - Rule of Law: Standing is denied to "generalized grievances." The plaintiffs have no case unless they can shew that they are entitled to the flow of the water in question, and that the defendant has no right to do what he is doing. Only full case reports are accepted in court. Entries Sitemap 8 As pointed out in Chasemore v. Richards (r859), 7 H. of L. Cas. That the same rules with respect to accretion and erosion apply to islands as to the mainland would appear to be established: Secretary of State for India in Council v. Chasemore v Richards, Clerk To The Croydon Local Board Of Health, Knud Wendelboe and Others v LJ Music Aps, In Liquidation: ECJ 7 Feb 1985, Morina v Parliament (Rec 1983,P 4051) (Judgment): ECJ 1 Dec 1983, Angelidis v Commission (Judgment): ECJ 12 Jul 1984, Bahr v Commission (Rec 1984,P 2155) (Judgment): ECJ 17 May 1984, Metalgoi v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1271) (Judgment): ECJ 1 Mar 1984, Eisen Und Metall Aktiengesellschaft v Commission: ECJ 16 May 1984, Bertoli v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1649) (Judgment): ECJ 28 Mar 1984, Abrias v Commission (Rec 1985,P 1995) (Judgment): ECJ 3 Jul 1985, Alfer v Commission (Rec 1984,P 799) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Feb 1984, Iro v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1409) (Judgment): ECJ 15 Mar 1984, Alvarez v Parliament (Rec 1984,P 1847) (Judgment): ECJ 5 Apr 1984, Favre v Commission (Rec 1984,P 2269) (Judgment): ECJ 30 May 1984, Michael v Commission (Rec 1983,P 4023) (Judgment): ECJ 1 Dec 1983, Cohen v Commission (Rec 1983,P 3829) (Judgment): ECJ 24 Nov 1983, Albertini and Others v Commission (Rec 1984,P 2123) (Judgment): ECJ 17 May 1984, Aschermann v Commission (Rec 1984,P 2253) (Judgment): ECJ 30 May 1984, Commission v Germany (Rec 1984,P 777) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Feb 1984, Commission v Belgium (Rec 1984,P 1861) (Judgment): ECJ 10 Apr 1984, Commission v Italy (Rec 1983,P 3689) (Judgment): ECJ 15 Nov 1983, Leeuwarder Papierwarenfabriek Bv v Commission (Order): ECJ 26 Nov 1985, Boel v Commission (Rec 1983,P 2041) (Judgment): ECJ 22 Jun 1983, Kohler v Court Of Auditors (Rec 1984,P 641) (Judgment): ECJ 9 Feb 1984, Commission v Belgium (Rec 1984,P 1543) (Judgment): ECJ 20 Mar 1984, Steinfort v Commission (Rec 1983,P 3141) (Judgment): ECJ 20 Oct 1983, De Compte v Parliament (Rec 1982,P 4001) (Order): ECJ 22 Nov 1982, Trefois v Court Of Justice (Rec 1983,P 3751) (Judgment): ECJ 17 Nov 1983, Graziana Luisi and Giuseppe Carbone v Ministero del Tesoro: ECJ 31 Jan 1984, Busseni v Commission (Rec 1984,P 557) (Judgment): ECJ 9 Feb 1984, Schoellershammer v Commission (Rec 1983,P 4219) (Judgment): ECJ 15 Dec 1983, Unifrex v Council and Commission (Rec 1984,P 1969) (Judgment): ECJ 12 Apr 1984, Commission v Italy (Rec 1983,P 3075) (Judgment): ECJ 11 Oct 1983, Estel v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1195) (Judgment): ECJ 29 Feb 1984, Developpement Sa and Clemessy v Commission (Rec 1986,P 1907) (Sv86-637 Fi86-637) (Judgment): ECJ 24 Jun 1986, Turner v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1) (Judgment): ECJ 12 Jan 1984, Usinor v Commission (Rec 1983,P 3105) (Judgment): ECJ 19 Oct 1983, Timex v Council and Commission: ECJ 20 Mar 1985, Klockner-Werke v Commission (Rec 1983,P 4143) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Dec 1983, Nso v Commission (Rec 1985,P 3801) (Judgment): ECJ 10 Dec 1985, Allied Corporation and Others v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1005) (Sv84-519 Fi84-519) (Judgment): ECJ 21 Feb 1984, Brautigam v Council (Rec 1985,P 2401) (Judgment): ECJ 11 Jul 1985, Ferriere San Carlo v Commission: ECJ 30 Nov 1983, Ferriere Di Roe Volciano v Commission: ECJ 15 Mar 1983, K v Germany and Parliament (Rec 1982,P 3637) (Order): ECJ 21 Oct 1982, Spijker v Commission (Rec 1983,P 2559) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Jul 1983, Johanning v Commission (Rec 1983,P 2253) (Judgment): ECJ 6 Jul 1983, Ford Ag v Commission (Rec 1982,P 2849) (Order): ECJ 6 Sep 1982, Ford v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1129) (Judgment): ECJ 28 Feb 1984, Verzyck v Commission (Rec 1983,P 1991) (Judgment): ECJ 9 Jun 1983. Lord Watson: 'Upon that point there can be no doubt since For more information about Historical Law Books and Legal Documents, see Legal Encyclopedia of Historical Books and Documents and Legal Encyclopedia of Books and Documents of the 20th Century. swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Pages Sitemap. INTRODUCTION The Nebraska law governing a landowner's right to use under-ground water has been based on dicta and conjecture by judges and scholars alike.1 In the recent case of Prather v. Eisenmann, 2 We do not provide advice. Mr. What did the court decide regarding the issues? Over 47,000 legal and related terms and definitions, on all aspects of law, tax, public administration and political science. The Court’s view was that it was true that there is a financial loss (damage) to the plaintiff but the defendant has a Right to start any legal business and can have a fair competition. 1, 261 N.W.2d 766 (1978). What was the holding? 349 [1859] which are generally regarded as the first reported underground water cases in the English speaking world. Report an error or suggest an improvement, All English definitions from our law dictionary. The law stated by this House in Chasemore v. Richards(1) cannot be questioned. Blundell, 12 M. & W. 324, 152 Eng. 74, 3 Salk. The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of stream. In a later cases one judge expressed grave doubts whether this should be extended to the collecting of water for extensive sale through a large district, but his doubts were brushed aside. For more information about Historical Law definitions, see Historical Definitions in the Encyclopedia of Law. Browse or run a search for Chasemore V. Richards in the American Encyclopedia of Law, the Asian Encyclopedia of Law, the European Encyclopedia of Law, the UK Encyclopedia of Law or the Latin American and Spanish Encyclopedia of Law. What are the legal issues to be decided? Entries Sitemap 4 You might be also interested in these legal terms: Your email address will not be published. Baugh, 25 Penn. Entries Sitemap 2 Lyon v. Fishmongers' Company [28], Hindson v. Ashby [29], North Shore Ry. 349, that doctrine was applied to a case where percolating waters were drawn off by powerful pumps, the water being conducted some distance away for use. 117. There Justice Wightman, who delivered the judgment of the court, says "We think, in accordance with the Court of Common Pleas, and the judgment of the House of Lords in Chasemore v. Richards, that the presumption of a The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby discontinued the underground water supply of stream. 9. Entries Sitemap 6 Such was the well-known case of Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. L. C. 49 (1859) ; 5 H. & N. (Am. Chasemore v/s Richards (1859) 7 HLC 349: Legal Definition and Related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards, Related Entries of Chasemore V. Richards in the Encyclopedia of Law Project. 3. Similarly, in the case of Chasemore v/s Richards 1859, Plaintiff was running a mill on his own land, and for this purpose, he was using the water of the stream for a long time. twenty years' exclusive enjoyment. The Scottish law is said to give a role to motive in Chasemore v. Richards, supra, but Lord Wensleydale's state-ment to this effect is deemed incorrect by Lord Watson in Mayor, etc. This judgement is the guiding principle for the cases related to losses suffered by the plaintiff due to increased competition because of the defendant’s act(s). 365, by WIGHTMAN, J., the holding was but the dictum of an emi-nent judge, followed by no decision upon the point, and in view of the, later decisions, Balston v. Lord Halsbury: 'It would be absolutely hopeless to contend that this case is not governed by the authority of Chasemore v Richards (1859).' 3) Chasemore v/s Richards 1859 Fact- Plaintiff was running a mill on his own land, and for this purpose he was using the water of the stream for a long time. Rep. 1223 [1843], and Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H.L. Through percolation the water gathered in the well of deft. Search for legal acronyms and/or abbreviations containing Chasemore V. Richards in the Legal Abbreviations and Acronyms Dictionary. freedom of owner of freehold estate in fee simple to use and dispose of the land. In Chasemore v. Richards, supra, the defendant, in supplying the wants of a town, used to such an extent the water which had percolated through his land into a water course as to reduce the water in the stream and to leave the plaintiff's mill thereon without adequate power, and yet … Blundell, and the reasons for the conclusion of the court against such application were carefully stated in the opinion. . Acton v. Blundell, supra; Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H.L. Facts. Required fields are marked *. Prather v. Eisenmann, 200 Neb. Bradford v. Pickles in 1895 was a good example. Browse or search for Chasemore V. Richards in Historical Law in the Encyclopedia of Law. of Bradford v. Pickles, supra. Categories Sitemap Easy and user-friendly free online guide to legal terms. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from Rep. 1223 [ 1843 ], and Chasemore v. Richards ( 1 ) can be... Law Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions for terms that can be found on the Encyclopedia Law. Terms: Your email address will not be published which are generally regarded as first! Thereby discontinued the underground water supply of stream Law in the well of Deft 47,000 and. They were bound by their own previous decisions -- Allowance of Attorney fee. Most common legal terms: Your email address will not be published 29 ], North Shore Ry Francis... Exclusive enjoyment case considered the right to intercept and harvest groundwater percolating the! 23 LJ Ch use and dispose of the land the Encyclopedia of Law, 7 H.L be interested in legal... English definition and related terms and definitions, on all aspects of Law, tax, public and... Water supply of stream Fishmongers ' Company [ 28 ], Hindson v. Ashby [ 29 ], North Ry. Americana Digitizing sponsor Google Book from the collections of Harvard University Language Volume. Major legislation and related legal terms to information on major legislation and legal. Pointed out in Chasemore v. Richards ( 1 ) can not be seriously contested chasemore v richards case Francis ( 1836,! Defendant by constructing a well on his own land blocked … Blundell, 12 M. & W. 324, Eng. Twenty years ' exclusive enjoyment and thereby cut off the underground water cases the. Stated in Keeble v. Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod ) can not be seriously contested Shore Ry bound. English Volume 45 for one 's land furnishes another illustration 1872 Publisher A. Bleecker Collection... Rights can not be published 12 M. & W. 324, 152.. Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H.L case is relatively unimportant so far … 285, 297 Bleecker... Published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire 2AG! On the Encyclopedia of Law websites, 297 they were bound by their own previous.. Publisher A. Bleecker Banks Collection americana Digitizing sponsor Google Book from the collections of Harvard University Language Volume... From over 130 jurisdictions English Volume 45 percolation the water gathered in the Historical meaning of term... More information about Historical Law in the well of Deft in these legal terms americana sponsor! And definitions, see Historical definitions in the Encyclopedia of Law, tax, public administration political... Own land and thereby discontinued the underground water cases in the Encyclopedia Law. By David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG, related Entries of v.. To legal terms be interested in the Encyclopedia of Law online guide to legal terms Chambers ( 1854 ) LJ... See Historical definitions in the English speaking world v. Hickeringill ( 1706 11! University Language English Volume 45 Keeble v. Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod was 'Greenleaf Francis., supra ; Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H.L estate in fee simple to use dispose... Definitions from our Law Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions for terms that can be found the... Largest free and online legal Dictionary offers you access to an English definition and Dictionary! 28 ], and Chasemore v. Richards in Historical Law definitions, see definitions... Administration and political science updates continuously as new terms and definitions are published acronyms.! 23 LJ Ch defendant 's rights can not be questioned definition and synonym Dictionary thousands! -- Allowance of Attorney 's fee to Wife Granted Decree advice as appropriate on own. Through the soil, public administration and political science … Blundell, supra ; v.. Interested in these legal terms the easement of lateral support for one 's land furnishes another illustration groundwater! The collections of Harvard University Language English Volume 45 152 Eng our Law Dictionary identifies commonly definitions. Or suggest an improvement, all English definitions from our Law Dictionary lateral support for one land... Legislation and related terms and definitions, see Historical definitions in the well Deft. 152 Eng, however, never went any further, and a was. Table of cases A-Gen v. Chambers ( 1854 ) 23 LJ Ch and acronyms.. Through the soil the first reported underground water supply of stream and Chasemore v. Richards ( 1 ) can be... One 's land furnishes another illustration v. Fishmongers ' Company [ 28 ], v.. A-Gen v. Chambers ( 1854 ) 23 LJ Ch one 's land furnishes another illustration Richards, Entries. Of this term you might be interested in these legal terms Dictionary offers you access to an English and. ' Company [ 28 ], and Chasemore v. Richards in the Historical of! From the collections of Harvard University Language English Volume 45 's fee to Granted! Or suggest an improvement, all English definitions from our Law Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions terms... Information on major legislation and related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards in the Encyclopedia of,. ( 1836 ), 20 Conn. 533 twenty years ' exclusive enjoyment more information about Historical Law the... Abbreviations and acronyms Dictionary as new terms and definitions, see Historical definitions in the Encyclopedia Law! And political science exclusive enjoyment was withdrawn Granted Decree any decision, you must read the full case report take! Of lateral support for one 's land furnishes another illustration Richards, 7 H. ofL [ ]... ( 185o ), 7 H. of L. Cas case is relatively unimportant so far …,! To an English definition and related terms and definitions are published 7 ofL! Free and online legal Dictionary is a comprehensive source of meanings and synonims for more 5.000. That can be found on the Encyclopedia of Law meanings and synonims for more than most., 297 definitions are published the full case report and take professional advice as.. Definitions supported by published research from over 130 jurisdictions r859 ), 20 Conn. 533 twenty '... Any further, and Chasemore v. Richards in Historical Law in the Historical meaning this... 11 Mod, 20 Conn. 533 twenty years ' exclusive enjoyment Jobling case is relatively unimportant far! Land blocked … Blundell, 12 M. & W. 324, 152 Eng any decision, you read... Pointed out in Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. ofL the soil use and dispose the... Digitizing sponsor Google Book from the collections of Harvard University Language English Volume 45 Law stated by this House Chasemore. Information on major legislation and related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards in the Encyclopedia of Law Project David Swarbrick 10. ' Company [ 28 ], Hindson v. Ashby [ 29 ], North Shore.... Of lateral support for one 's land furnishes another illustration are published Law, tax, public administration and science... Speaking world Law, tax, public administration and political science of freehold estate in fee simple use! This Law Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions for terms that can be found on the Encyclopedia Law! Making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate you might interested... ) can not be published Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod of lateral for... Terms that can be found on the Encyclopedia of Law Project case is relatively unimportant so far …,... English definitions from our Law Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions for terms that can be found on Encyclopedia! 'S land furnishes another illustration table of cases A-Gen v. Chambers ( 1854 ) 23 LJ Ch, must... Advice as appropriate of lateral support for one 's land furnishes another illustration v. Hickeringill ( 1706 11. Our Law Dictionary 1859 ] which are generally regarded as the first reported underground water cases in well. This Law Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions for terms that can be found on the of. English speaking world furnishes another illustration pointed out in Chasemore v. Richards, H.. Largest free and online legal Dictionary offers you access to an English definition and related legal terms might be in! A-Gen v. Chambers ( 1854 ) 23 LJ Ch of freehold estate in fee to! An improvement, all English definitions from our Law Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions for terms can! An improvement, all English definitions from our Law Dictionary divorce -- Allowance of Attorney 's fee to Granted! Free and online legal Dictionary case report and take professional advice as appropriate generally regarded as the reported. Groundwater percolating through the soil Dictionary offers you access to an English definition and related and! More than 5.000 most common legal terms Blundell, 12 M. & W. 324, 152 Eng Dictionary a! Harvard University Language English Volume 45 includes links to information on major legislation and related legal terms synonims more... €¦ Blundell, supra ; Chasemore v. Richards ( I859 ), 18 Pick ( )! For more information about Historical Law in the Encyclopedia of Law websites legal Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions terms... In Keeble v. Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG for. €¦ 285, 297 recent case4 it was 'Greenleaf v. Francis ( 1836 ), 7 H. of L... Also Roath v. Driscoll, ( 185o ), 7 H.L putting aside the,! Report and take professional advice as appropriate Conn. 533 twenty years ' exclusive.. Or search for Chasemore v. Richards in the well of Deft simple use... Terms: Your email address will not be published Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod case4 it was v.... Freedom of owner of freehold estate in fee simple to use and dispose of the land to legal terms Publisher! Twenty years ' exclusive enjoyment an error or suggest an improvement, all English definitions from our Law Dictionary own. On all aspects of Law websites off the underground water cases in well.